MENU

© 2026 QuickCut.

All rights reserved.

EXPLORE

Politics28 APR 2026, 00:28 PM2

Calcutta High Court Denies Urgent Intervention Against Election Observer Ajay Sharma

Synced from Source
Calcutta High Court Denies Urgent Intervention Against Election Observer Ajay Sharma

KOLKATA: The Calcutta High Court has denied an urgent plea against election observer Ajay Sharma, accused of violating the Model Code of Conduct during the West Bengal Assembly Elections. The court stated it would not intervene in matters related to election officers until after the polling phase ends on April 29. Despite allegations of threats made by Sharma, the court suggested addressing concerns with the Election Commission of India.

KOLKATA: In a notable ruling, the Calcutta High Court on Tuesday refused to issue urgent orders against Indian Police Service (IPS) Officer Ajay Pal Sharma, who is currently serving as a police observer for the ongoing West Bengal Assembly Elections. Justice Krishna Rao made it clear that no directions would be passed against any election duty officer until after the final polling phase concludes on April 29.

The court's decision came in response to allegations made by a petitioner alleging that Sharma had violated the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) by threatening voters. The petitioner, who argued that Sharma's conduct warranted immediate intervention, highlighted a recent incident where Sharma purportedly warned Falta Trinamool Congress (TMC) candidate Jehangir Khan. This event was described as a critical violation of protocol.

When confronted with claims that Sharma was coercive towards voters and candidates alike, the court suggested the petitioner should report these grievances to the Election Commission of India (ECI). "What can be done? What will we do?" Justice Rao asked, signaling skepticism about the court's role in intervening during an active election period.

The lawyer representing the petitioner urgently requested the court to restrict Sharma’s actions, asserting that strong evidence substantiates claims of his overreach. However, despite the counsel's pleas for immediate relief, the court reiterated its stance—refusing to act against any election officer until the polling period was completed. The court ultimately set new timelines but struggled to address the urgent submissions adequately before polling began.

The TMC has vociferously criticized the ECI for failing to take necessary actions against officers such as Sharma, raising questions about the integrity of the electoral process. This ruling reflects ongoing tensions in West Bengal’s politically charged environment, as parties and activists alike navigate the complexities of the upcoming elections. As the political landscape continues to evolve, citizens and stakeholders will be closely monitoring the situation ahead of the polling conclusion.


Discussion

Posting as Guest

Loading comments...

Continue Reading